醉美冰雪季 非遗过大年——第二届黑龙江冰雪非遗周即将启幕******
弦歌不辍，薪火相传。第二届黑龙江冰雪非遗周将于1月17日在哈尔滨防洪纪念塔广场及步行街启幕，旨在进一步宣传推广黑龙江非遗资源，推动非遗保护利用更好服务于经济社会发展，促进文旅深度融合，助力冰雪旅游发展。
第二届黑龙江冰雪非遗周由省文化和旅游厅主办，黑龙江日报报业集团、哈尔滨市文化广电和旅游局和哈尔滨市道里区人民政府联办。活动现场将搭建“党的二十大报告金句”展板、“牢记嘱托奋进新时代”展板、中式阁楼非遗展区、红灯笼长廊、彩灯馆、红灯笼馆，组织“非凡十年·龙江——百人百米百图剪纸展”，举办“潮起龙江·非遗迎春灯光秀”，布置室内非遗展示展销区和黑龙江世居少数民族现场歌舞互动活动等内容。
连续10天上演非遗迎春灯光秀
开幕式当天，将对2022“龙江非遗年度人物”进行颁奖。游客和市民在现场除了可欣赏黑龙江少数民族传承人着赫哲族、鄂伦春族等民族传统服饰表演的歌舞外，还可与非遗传承人进行歌舞互动。
持续10天晚上、200组激光灯，极具科技感，绚丽多彩的“潮起龙江·非遗迎春灯光秀”，将为游客带来一场视觉盛宴。
红灯笼长廊 打造网红打卡地
本次活动不仅设有“党的二十大报告金句”展板和“牢记嘱托奋进新时代”展板专区，还将举办由我省百名剪纸传承人剪刻的“非凡十年·龙江——百人百米百图剪纸展”。
长80米，悬挂3000个样式各异的红灯笼长廊内，悬挂20幅麦秸画、10幅木版年画作品供游客观赏。高低错落的红灯笼，红红火火的节日气氛，必将成为游客新的网红打卡地。
多彩非遗作品彰显独特魅力
本次活动特搭建彩灯馆和潮起非遗大舞台，其中彩灯馆将展出我省100个彭氏灯彩和500个省外灯彩作品，同时展出4幅兰西挂钱传承人剪刻的高3米、宽1米“四大精神”剪纸作品。潮起非遗大舞台将展示渤海靺鞨绣、麦秆剪贴、美江木艺、金漆镶嵌工艺、黑陶、布艺、木雕、山核桃雕刻等传统技艺作品。周边还有21个展柜展出唐三彩、鱼皮、狍皮等150件非遗作品。
另外，本次活动特别在步行街左侧的哈尔滨印象城（原万达广场）内，设置了室内非遗展示展销区，在展销区内，组织了30余项非遗项目进行展销，其中包括国家级项目麦秆剪贴、渤海靺鞨绣、刀剑锻制技艺、赫哲族鱼皮制作技艺、桦树皮制作技艺、省级项目金漆镶嵌工艺、手工布艺、山核桃工艺、黑陶制作技艺、桦树皮画、青牛葫芦制作技艺、剪纸等项目。在室内展区，同时也展出了省非遗中心设计制作的6款共30组龙江非遗伴手礼盒。
在室内展区，同样采用了新年对联、中国结等传统节日元素，营造出了新年喜庆、祥和的节日氛围，为室内展区增加了一抹新年亮色。
来源 | 省非遗中心
排版 | 张文璋
统筹 | 杨晓蕾 陈金丹
审核 | 吴 璇
监制 | 刘梦杰
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
| 大发彩票地图 |
